>>92390
>Reads your post
You alright, anon. Sorry about that.
>>92391
>The one thing we need to stop doing is claiming ancient Israelites as jews.
Right, my bad. Even the Bible says the lineage is
>Abraham → Issac → Jacob/Israel → Judah (and 11 others),
not
>Judah → Abraham and everyone descended from him
as (((they))) claim, though they're mostly not even descended from Judah.
And even though after that (the tribes of) Judah and Benjamin survived as a nation, they still rejected Jesus THE OBVIOUS MESSIAH in favour of (((Babylonian Kaballah Satanists disguised as Pharisees and Sadducees))), and thus got (rightly) kicked out in AD 70 to be mixed with the Gentiles they so hated... And then got lost in the mire of the Khazars (and maybe some other places) as a result.
>>92397
Those are some nice pictures, anon.
>The reference always leads back to Herodotus who was declared a liar by Ctesias and Plutarch.
The reference to the Phoenician alphabet? In my defense, what I was trying to get at was that the Phoenicians were Samaritan/Canaanite, not that they were (((Jewish))), (either Judean OR Khazar), I was only trying to understand where you were coming from. I think we understand each other better anon, this was a good thread. I was only trying to say that,
(though traitors (the vast majority of ancient) Judah chose to be to the Messiah, which is why of the 12 disciples, JUDAS (cognate with Judah) was the traitor, I think Jesus chose 12 disciples on purpose, just as God chose to give Jacob 12 sons that would inherit Israel)
Judah, (the actual Semitic tribe) was still _related_ to the other 11 tribes, whose ancestors adopted the Egyptian hieroglyphs. Of course they had already adopted a lot of (((Babylonian))) stuff and turned their backs on God by the time Jesus came, but they weren't Khazarian Turks masquerading as Semites at that point.