>I regularly re-read The Hobbit because it's the first book I ever read, and most of that book is Bilbo and the Dwarves' various brushes with death, but I find it exceedingly comfy. We are on the same page then.
>although before you pointing that out I had just assumed it was British (or Received Pronunciation, I'm in a pedantic mood) to make her sound 'posh'. Technically, the history of that accent is trying to emulate a British accent to sound posh, so yeah, in a way it is, just a specific way.
>but then again that's mostly because the nature of petrification itself begs rather a lot of questions in terms of specifics to begin with. Completely agreed. I think I will revisit this when we get to Return of Harmony (even if that probably is a different type of magic involved.)
> real children are annoying, so realistic child characters might well be too! Or at least can be annoying or boring. I think there is certain aspects of child centric thought/POV that are overlooked BUT if you are going for the average child that moderately relates to a 21st century westerner this still might apply. Innocence and wonder versus mischievousness and... hyperactivity. I might be opening a whole can of worms with that.
>It might be prudent given current events to namefag... Your call. Namefaging for these reviews might make sense depending on activity. I wouldn't count it as violating our softer anon rules as this is a project.
