>>2397
>The others look in varing states of improvment but this is dramatic.
thanks but there are a few things I have to comment about them.

First, there is one half truth about those pc edits and it´s that I had not posted the mobile edits that were left in the middle of the editing for >>2392 and >>2391. I should have posted them as mobile + PC edit in the archives.

Whenever you see the flawed effect for random chaos, the only way I can apply it is on mobile. It seems I cannot do that on PC nor I would have the same results handling a mouse than my own fingers.

Here you have them for noticing and being able to check what I have changed in the middle of the process because it´s a lot harder to describe what slight change I have made for such little time but I will try to explain what I am doing on PC...