>>2541
>I expected a positive reaction but not with that comment of mastering illusions and subtlety even though I love the fake realism concept (Blade Runner) and subtle conflicts/details (season 8) to point out above the main moral.
>>2525
> Not calling you a master of illusion or anything but I am impressed. It opens up new avenues in editing as this is probably the best change of situation you have done.
I recognize that you are not a master of illusion and it merely was a simple edit of many of pictures of ponies, I was still impressed with the thought put into it. and the fact you removed the bobbles so well. It made me think of doing removals and such and my mind just ran a little with possibilities.

>well thanks. I am glad to have offered something else with the same old tools and that comment relieves me because I felt like I was running out of ideas or punchy material to add over here.
Don't worry about ideas. You're not here to impress. Most of this is from messing around without an afterthought. Sometimes leaving stuff to be desired, sometimes, cool ad in a few cases downright awesome. Just do what you feel lke in our own time.

>I just wanted to make an experiment and hide the fact that they were underwater. Focusing on the cuteness and simplicity served to hide the rest. This is why the eye betrays a lot and psychedelic abstract images exist. You said it was about romance and it served to hide one element (their cheeks) and just pretended that it was very simple, nothing special to mention around it...
That was mere joking sarcasm on my part. It was a Pinkie Pie tier trick. It amused me, but it wasn't anything I saw as truly amazing.