>>2961
>Not because of a matter of taste but because of technical qualities/issues beforehand. It´s almost like comparing gen 4 to the rest. If it received a better progression in it, it would mean they cared more about the series around that time. The CGI while not outstanding, its serviceable (and doesn´t clash that much with the background, at least from what I see from the gif) but I don´t want to imagine how the other two looked.
Cybertron was awkward and clunky still at times, but it was usually at least half-decent (though still clashed with 2d), and sometimes pretty good. Armada, was 2d, so it was rushed badly and had some really poorly animated moments, but it also had some good animation down the line.

>My only hope is that gen 5 gives more entertainment value than the pre gen 4 content. At least, reaching a point in which deciding gen 4 over gen 5 or in reverse is a discussion of tastes and not because of greedy strategies that drive it into a subpar territory like Energon did. At least, it´d better deliver a good artstyle for the fanbase.
Agreed.

>then it´s a matter of the audience and expectations but I get those complaints as well. By following the same formula as any other anime, it´s no wonder it shows the same problems.
They all were technically anime that hasbro had to splice in various ways, but Cybertron was the most anime acting of them.