>>3120
>I have to lurk and tell who is behind the posts
And here I am, having legitimate trouble telling definitely you two apart at a times, or telling who is who. Imagine my confusion back in January '18 when I started getting double replies

...Actually, why are you trying to credit me with kicking this whole thing off, when my post was only a second? If there was no post to reply, I would have not made a reply. Checkmate.

>that would require some heavy weaponry
Snatching the GET? Not quite. Just mostly luck, probably. Dealing with fallout, if any, maybe. But how mad and vengeful can one be over 1 stolen post of round digits? (famous Internet last words)

>What I find worrisome about being a mod is that there is no useful feedback and if you make mistakes, other anons believe that it´s censorship or anything related. Well, that and any random reply that could drive to serious business
Now I kind of see why 4chan mods went quieter and quieter as time went on, from plenty of interactions and public bans, to behind-the-scenes invisible moderation. Though it certainly did create a positive-feedback loop, which didn't help their case any.

>actual owner is aware of those events from happening over here
He is? Well I guess if I were the owner of small chan, I'd also poke around any boards that had a sign of activity, at least once in a while.

>we could use the NMAiE general for pastebins and stuff, compiling the links, threads and all the stuff. It´s easy to copy it from any user and by just simply using CTRL+V from any Word´s user, you recover it.
Actually, saving a local copy of all threads (just text) is very simple, really trivial even. Just did that today, in fact (the attached zip file)