>>3139
>really?
>No flooding/spamming for the purpose of advertisement.
>for the purpose
The wording clearly implies the context under which the action is forbidden, all other contexts are not. Granted, that's obviously not what the chan owner meant, and enforcing it pragmatically means no flooding/spamming whatsoever. But there You have it, the spirit and the letter of the law. Sometimes can be really two different things.

>We are all pessimistic about gen 5
Yeah. G4 was once in a lifetime.