>>3142
>yeah, having pseudo intellectuals or egomaniacs that believe that they know everything just by reading 4 articles about the topic
Oh hey, that's me.
>they adapt a contrarian hateful vision about it because it´s too popular and accessible for normal people
Oh hey, that's also me. Maybe not in exact way this time, but love me some devil's advocate and contrarianism.

>I am mostly referring to any average fast thread of 4chan that follows the topic but there are several users participating yet don´t take into account other points of some users. The lurker can look at anything while the poster focuses on those lines.
>without any bias because posters only focus on checking who has the biggest one out of there
Oh that's true, certainly. Most of the times posters are set on winning the debate, and no one ever changes the viewpoint I kinda blame human psychology
Uninvolved lurkers fit into the role of a judge perfectly. Though they still may silently pick sides based on their biases.