>>3155 >I'm not against namefaging or tripfaging in general, though even on chans that had it I usually refrained. yeah but i think I will stay nameless for a while unless I write something new.
>I always heard their was a chaotic group of tripfags and tripfags used to be more common on /mlp/ as well... there are actually constant tripfags over their generals. Particularly MLPG and probably the CYOA?
>and some anon mentioned us once yeah, he visited this board around early December/late November I think and he screamed because of the amount of content posted over here. He had thought that we were a community because of the bug in the normies number.
>>3156 >The wording clearly implies the context under which the action is forbidden, all other contexts are not. >3.No spamming; no flooding that compromises normal operation of the site. >right at the front of the page >but the 3rd rule was actually since the beginning
