>>3180
>It certainly is simple, but some of these are a pretty good improvement.
these are images that I consider as something that you find for filling the numbers of Derpi. It´s like going to a supermarket and collecting 2nd hand material that not many people care, especially when they have the artist needed tag. I prefer putting something different on other images. These ones only needed some adjustments that a simple editor would polish pretty well.

>This is especially a good.
yeah. I was struggling for a while in the brightness and shadows to see how it worked the best. I had a couple of edits just to compare the brightness and I finally ended up posting that one because I saw it was the most pleasing to look at while keeping a logical lightning.

>This is the least improved edit.
It didn´t need much else than that honestly. I simply thought that playing a little bit with the contrast and the shadows would cause a bigger impact.

Surprisingly enough, your compressed image looks completely fine on mobile for some reason. Quite an achievement.