>>6134 >And you know what? I would applaud the huge risk at experimenting to a whole new level for the franchise even if it failed. I think if they try to partly maintain some mythical feel it could make the dynamic interesting even if it's accidental.
>Hasbro is going to adapt a meta route for criticizing its detractors (like Fame And Misfortune but referencing /mlp/ with a computer). Yeah, I agree wholeheartedly with those fears. How much of that was Hasbro and how much of that was the writers themselves? I say we have to worry more of the later than the former though honestly seeing a chan referenced would be a weird achievement in a way. But yeah I wouldn't put it out of the realm of possibility for them to for them to stir things up a little.
>Beyond the dialogues and/or interactions between those two, the episode isn´t bringing anything new on paper.
>we know that this is not cyberpunk at all and that advanced tech won´t contribute to any interesting plot device. Old memes from 6 months or more that I have no memory of do to being on tiktoc doesn't sound very compelling at all.
>>6138 Though I have more to get to I suppose I am as well.
