>>6716
>I have seen sometimes pretty vigerous debate in the comments and a I know a couple of posters who /mlp/ may respect.
That´s the problem with establishing stereotypes or imply that everything is going to follow the standard premise.

Yes, indeed. EQD has delivered intense debates, especially towards the show for certain episodes. There have been series of replies among the comments which would turn out to be pretty long with paragraphs trying to prove each other wrong and reach a pretty uptight debate.

Just that said debates have diminished in terms of frequency because there are less people to make the comment section juicy and interesting to watch. Furthermore, the most daring opinions were arisen because you could post without any account that would reveal yourself, showing up as a generic user and start those intense debates. However, EQD decided to remove that option like 2 or 3 years ago (if anyone knows/can find the date of change, report it because I am uncertain of that date) and that pretty much discouraged the dissent opinions without facing problems in terms of public image, ending up less interesting. There will be some fire out there in a number of articles, but in comparison with those years, EQD doesn´t deliver those resilient debates to that extent.