>>7844
>I actually have seen stuff on there that has earned my respect.
>>7845
> (more on this later, as I gotta hit the hay
This thread:
Hey, were did it go? There was a thread on there where they were talking about archiving the birth of the show and fanodm, but I didn't bookmark the link and a related google doc they had... just a few days ago, won't load. I highly doubt they deleted it in reaction to us here but it is kind of odd.

>>7851
I get where you are coming from. Though I will say, a lot of dark, and oddball stuff happens on wiki and doesn't get in the spotlight. I mean, if somepony wanted to, they could really really turn our fandom into the next alt-right boogieman. Something I fear would happen with the derpi drama, but it didn't happen. I do agree there is an increased risk but I don't think a million jornos are going to descend down upon us from one wiki article.

>The autism of wiki knows no bounds and it the page survives it will be a battleground
Everything about this though is 100% true. Even if I don't think media attention is a high probability, there are bad actors within wiki and associated criticism that I do think merit some concern.