>>8128 >Like, I don't know anything about psychology but I think that if you tell people directly instead of just some general "info post", you'll get higher chance that they'll actually "remember" you, if you know what I mean. Of course more general message should work as well. >This actually sounds really good, I think that there is higher chance of people knowing that something is going bad when they are actively using that site Tell users directly + general info post it is then. I have to get "infrastructure" (meaning thread, and hopefully failback area) organized first but I think I will go ahead and try launching it in some form at least. It wouldn't hurt.
>I don't even think you would need fully working Pegasi project for this to be useful (of course it would be more effective) but having some plans prepared in general with roles you could pick sounds good to me. Indeed I agree with that. If done right, it would make efforts be a lot smoother. I am always cautious and I've seen other projects by far my experienced people implode and I am someone who often has a busy IRL so that is why I mention any leery feeling. Taking it slow I guess.
>That is, combining both most probably can't hurt and if any way proved to be ineffective we can just stop doing it. Hey, even if we can't get it to "detect" trouble exactly even having something that kept a news feed of all the areas to look would still be useful.
> and I would expect most danger to come from sites that are not directly meant for ponies in the first place, so they could get in "crossfire" of some retarded rule. Like:
https://forums.spacebattles.com/ Which, though I haven't dug deep, have always heard over the years about it having a moderately significant fandom presence and some small amount of OC that is even native to there.
