>>11513
thank you for helping us think clearly about this, anon

imo, anon isn't trying to make a Q proof
anon is potentially proofing Q+ is monitoring this chan
thats it
not dropping intel
not IDing some random anon as Q (why would that be the assumed premise?)
did Q clearly state what delta were and were not for?
would sincerely like to know what is in the drop history in this subject
tyvm anons
keep your eyes open
see something, say something

o7