>>11704
Dang, I'll say it again, we really could use UIDs here ... Kek!
>Q said there are no coincidences
Yeah I know. One of the few clockfags here, and reading all kinds of shit and looking at all kinds of numbers/methods/approaches, I have learned that indeed there are coincidences ... But what can one say, and what do I know ....
.... except that with "disinformation is necessary" it all becomes useless absent some real good clues & advice.

>Re: MSM
No use to tell these motherfuckers anything.
The way they behave, they so much remind me of Twain's saying:
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Anyone with a clear view and at least decently free of the (unfortunately too common) brainwashing should know that something is going really wrong, and that even logics & common sense say so.

>Re: "violent" Q-followers
Same as above. And it wouldn't even take a scientists to show it, I should think. One way that might work:
Get the twitter API
Analyze all tweets #Qanon (and associated like #GreatAwakening etc)
Analyze all tweets #resist (and assoc.)