>>16376
My bad, I actually just picked the previous one listed (was top "general thread" on page 2).
At least, I thought I did. I generally search for "general" so if it doesn't contain that in the title, I miss it.

I kinda wondered why I was asked to do it when halfway through there were other notable buns.

Eh.

I can do another shitty list in a few hours of the correct threads, if nobody else has done it before. Or at least anywhere we still have missing.