>>18335
One man's opinion.
Not everyone's.
Anonymity good for security.
But will it really cure vanity?
Some anons are proud of being anon--carry on endlessly about namefagging etc.
(Couldn't that be a form of vanity??)
(wasn't meant as a critique of >>18347 btw, wrote it before--but might be worth reflecting on)


This anon enjoys anonymity.
Say something dumb?
No problem.
Moving right along....

But thanks for posting, good to know about this historic post, although it seems awfully flat-footed 4 a chan post. Guy should write regs for the IRS.