>>20313
You can review the content. You can write an Amazon review (or a review elsewhere).
You can write a review and post it here. I wrote a chapter by chapter review of one of the books published last March in QR.
Would like to see moar reviews like that (instead of complaints that such books exist). You can't stop people from publishing, that's just the way the world works. (and besides--muh free speech, right?)

You could also do a twitter thread review, one chapter per tweet.

Peer review doesn't apply, not as the term is generally used. To "peer review" the content means you get to vet it beforehand as an expert. (and as used in academic, to decide whether or not it is respectable enough to be published in a certain academic journal).

It's not our business to "vet" material prior to publication unless we are the publisher. But you can be that, too. Anyone can publish these days. Write your own book evaluating the work of other Q writers. Or putting forth an alternative view of Q movement, Qresearch, etc.

Now you prolly don't want to write a book, most people don't. I have done, and it's a shitload of work (which is why people generally want to get paid for it).

What you may be expressing is the frustration felt because there is so much written these days about Q movement that is really crappy. Why? BC early books on a new subject are often crappy because the better writer-researchers take longer and write better books.

In the end, if you think there is something that you can say better, then say it. Write it. Publish it. Just like we do here: we say our peace and hope the best ideas win.