>>22110
Wouldn't use the word "gullible" but rather "uninformed." I wasn't around way back when but know there's a problem. Pammy is Pamplet Anon, is this true? I listened a lot to Patriot Soapbox early on; never heard anything that sounded like disinfo but was later aware that anons did not like that crowd bc of things that happened early on. Still don't know the details.

IMO, It can be hard to know the difference between "comp'd" and "questionable." There are lots of people I don't fully trust--or am not sure of--but I wouldn't call them comp'd unless i have definite evidence of fuckery. Or Q saying so (and even then, you have to be careful due to the potential for deliberate misinfo).

when posting material, I sometimes find excellent material from people I know are not generally popular here. If so, I usually post anyway, but make sure anons know the source. Then they can judge for themselves what to think.