>>26066
Well, i get somewhat concerned if there are a lot of posts on anything occult that sort of don't seem to lead anywhere concrete, because not everyone has that kind of spiritual grounding that you do. A lot of spiritual teachers warn people about getting too caught up in this stuff, which can be both dazzling and scary--not a good combo.

Sometimes Q posts something that takes anons in this direction, but then they are responding to his prompt and don't get too caught up in this stuff. But shills also post *extensively* on all kinds of occult material on QResearch. Not to teach us anything but just to distract, confuse, and fascinate us with material that most of us can't really use to bring down the cabal--we just don't have the background. The darker stuff is at best a slide and at worst a 'slippery slope' kind of scenario for those who have never spent much time looking at symbolism, archetypes or esoteric literature.

Starting from scratch (e.g., reading a 500 page book by Waite on freemasonry--when you have no background) is more likely to confuse than illuminate. So much moar to be gained when anons focus on areas with which they are familiar. All of us have expertise in some field--let's us THAT in our digs. So much existing knowledge and talent here.
o7