>>3953
In the past someone marked one of more of my posts here as "NotQ". That means someone is jumping to wrong conclusions, if "NotQ" is supposed to mean "This was probably from Q".

IMO, Q will not be posting here at all. Either way, I don't think 99% of anons would even suspect those in >>3946 as being from him.

Not trying to dampen your enthusiasm, but I recommend to drop this line of thinking completely, and just judge each post by its own merit instead of imagining who it's from. The only thing that speculating does is make this board look like a place for newfags, and possibly spread false info.

On 8, Q posted with a tripcode and signed his posts as Q. There would be no reason for him to make it unclear or mysterious. In the unlikely case that he would start posting here, he would make it clear and verifiable so that we wouldn't need to guess.

We know Q team is real. We have reasons to believe the things that he said will happen, will indeed happen. We don't need to think he's posting here in order for either of those things to remain true.
Carry on anons. Re-read drops. Dig, meme, pray.