>>9638
I disagree, it was brilliant and effective. In fact, it did get people shocked into connecting mental illness with "climate change" and by using argumentum ad absurdum, shoved in people's faces the ultimate aim of "climate change" - to limit the population. It tapped into the several veins of nuttiness that have popped through into mass consciousness: population reduction and cannibalism. While both of those are distasteful, ONLY white people voluntarily adopted population reduction (for the purposes they were sold: virtuous saving of the planet) while everyone else still pops out not only replacement-level children but far more. Cannibalism has been introduced slowly, at the margins - there is a sub on plebbit dedicated to cannibalism and some head honcho is quite active there. Even as recently as last week, some nutty Scandinavian academic floated the idea of cannibalism to help lower the overall population for "climate change."

Having some hysterical millennial intentionally go overboard and seem quite serious is genius. She seemed to be the natural progression of St. Greta the Green, no? So the LaRouchies have shoved the Malthusian-nature of "climate change" alarmism and hysterics right into the faces of everyone.