>>9747
Including dates is great.
I noticed that one shill tactic is posting great article from 3 years ago that don't have the date in the link. If baker doesn't check, shill calls him out later.

Now I often include authors, too--because "all authors are not created equal" John Solomon pretty different from Travis View, ha-ha....

>Re copypasta below sourcelink
In addition to article excerpts, anons sometimes include additional comments. I did this when it's a dig i've worked on a long time. (As anons get moar and more familiar with certain topics, it makes sense to comment on articles, espec MSM articles--pointing out there they go wrong)

Almost always include a screenshot of entire article. When baking, if the bred is slow enough, i often retrieve the article and tag it to the original. Phone fags like that--it's what they want to do but can't, bc it's too complicated.

Adding screenshots is a great way to help out when you're a newfag, too, i did it a lot at the start