>>118646
they did autopsy especially if the cause of death was unknown or obscure.
now they use the excuse "too much money"
It's a forensic issue in police work; maybe FBI would prefer police work on murders was ended?
Just as with no more exit polls on elections day (which has turned into election months - not sus at all /s/)
Think of Breitbart. were'nt there two autopsies. Second was falsified also; but assistant medical examiner spoke out?
They use / used the data they find when writing up the death certificate i.e. cause of death; if they don't do the autopsy, they just guess.
document is only as good as the person who's writing it, their info, care and honesty.
Just because something is in writing, does that make it true?
Just because somethings on NPR, does that make it true?
News networks in general.
If "everyone" believes something which is false, does that make it true?
It may seem silly to very well-educated people, certain of the expertise and superiority, but you must check your premises, otherwise all your work reduces to zip.
cf. recent admission by Scott Adams. discusses problem solving and heuristic method (which is considered inferior) However, if your premises are incorrect you are fuked, when tryng to solve a problem
Many genealogy records are falsified, especially if you go back to the middle ages.
Rich people paid for them?
>>118642 pb