>>155200, >>155201, >>155202, >>155203, >>155204, >>155205, >>155206, >>155207, >>155208, >>155209, >>155210, >>155211, >>155212, >>155213
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - I saw this post at midnight last night, Mountain Time. My mother, among several others, had done an excellent job of ratioing this post.
Now, it's 6:34 AM, and Jose mysteriously has accumulated 10 thousand plus likes overnight.
And people deny the existence of foreign bots.
Quote
Alex Padilla @AlexPadilla4CA
I asked a question—and ended up in handcuffs.
If this is how the Trump administration treats a U.S. Senator in broad daylight, imagine what they’re doing to immigrants behind closed doors.
We cannot stay silent. We will not back down.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1936402861459714260

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Dear Mr. Kristol,
Nice try with the motte-and-bailey routine. The "motte" is that Iran must not get nuclear weapons, a point nearly everyone agrees on. But the "bailey" you're really defending is that we should intervene and force Iran to become a liberal democracy.
Rejecting globalism is not the same as isolationism. "America First" means protecting U.S. interests with strength. Neutralizing Iran's offensive threat without dragging us into another nation-building fiasco would be a textbook example of "America First."
But let's switch topics.
I've been digging into the history of globalist "successes." One recurring theme is how elite efforts to democratize foreign regimes often lead to the opposite of what was promised. Look at Russia in the 90s: after the fall of USSR, Western NGOs rushed to make a liberal democracy out of Russia.
They enriched oligarchs, fueled resentment, and laid the groundwork for the rise of Putin. But nobody speaks of this history. Globalists swept this under the rug, without any accountability. The same thing is happening in South America, but I digress.