>>160071, >>160072, >>160073, >>160074, >>160075, >>160076, >>160077, >>160078, >>160079, >>160080, >>160081, >>160082
At a Reform event in Essex, Farage even removed the line ‘mass deportation’ from my speech.
He later told the Telegraph he thought it was 'a very grave, dark and dangerous use of language.'
What's changed?
In that same speech he instructed me to remove a reference to deporting these complicit foreign nationals. I refused. I'm glad I did.
He says millions can't go? I disagree.
My position is clear, and it’s one the British people agree with.
Mass deportation of every single illegal migrant. Abolish the entire asylum system. Review all refugee claims given to illegal arrivals, with deportation the default. And actually, the biggest problem of them all? Legal immigration.
A large number of legal migrants, who have failed to uphold their end of the deal, need to go home too.
Not working, not contributing, not integrating, not even speaking English? Go home.
From what I can see - the Reform plan is nowhere near enough. Even on deporting illegals. It's just not enough. It's weak. They ALL must go. Not some, ALL.
Farage was also questioned why my plan would cost far more than his? His response?
Because "Zia is really good at maths".
No. It's because it's because your plan is weak.
All very disappointing. We need to be brave to take our country back, and this is not brave.
We have already shifted the entire public debate in six months. Let’s keep pushing.
Mass deportations, and I mean proper mass deportations, must happen.