Anonymous
09/11/2025 (Thu) 13:00
Id: 2a666e
No.160707
del
>>160684,
>>160685,
>>160686,
>>160687,
>>160688,
>>160689,
>>160690,
>>160691,
>>160692,
>>160693,
>>160694,
>>160695,
>>160696,
>>160697,
>>160698,
>>160699,
>>160700,
>>160701,
>>160702,
>>160703,
>>160704,
>>160705,
>>160706Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley - Charlie energized a generation of college students at a time of intense liberal orthodoxy and intolerance. Just before he was shot, Kirk rallied the group with its signature chant of “prove me wrong.”
The response was to kill Charlie Kirk...
https://jonathanturley.org/2025/09/11/prove-me-wrong-charlie-kirks-final-challenge-on-free-speech/https://x.com/JonathanTurley/status/1966043544155537611Julie Kelly @julie_kelly2 - The kids are not alright tonight.
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1965938280522002674Julie Kelly @julie_kelly2 - It did not sound during the August 29 hearing that Judge Jia Cobb was prepared to issue a temp restraining order/preliminary injunction to overturn the president's firing of Lisa Cook.
But less 10 days later--and only five days after the president filed his response-Cobb issued a 49-page opinion granting Cook's motion and prohibiting her removal from the Federal Reserve Board.
Cobb acknowledged that Cook's case is the first "for cause" removal in the Fed's 111-year history and admits that the Fed Reserve Act statute does not define "for cause."
But despite the unprecedented nature of the case and essentially no case law to guide her, Cobb nonetheless goes out of her way to parse the Fed Reserve Act language related to "cause" in Cook's favor--citing case law demonstrating "cause" must involve “inefficiency, neglect of duty, and malfeasance in office."
Cobb:
"The best reading of the 'for cause' provision is that the bases for removal of a member of the Board of Governors are limited to grounds concerning a Governor’s behavior in office and whether they have been faithfully and effectively executing their statutory duties. 'For cause' thus does not contemplate removing an individual purely for conduct that occurred before they began in office."
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1965785726416781332
Message too long. Click here to view full text.