>>162668, >>162669, >>162670, >>162671, >>162672, >>162673, >>162674, >>162675, >>162676, >>162677, >>162678, >>162679, >>162680, >>162681, >>162682, >>162683, >>162684, >>162685, >>162686, >>162688, >>162689, >>162690, >>162691
This is not about who is right or wrong or whose theory is correct.
Candace’s investigation is about actually getting to the truth whatever that truth is.
If the current theory for the shooter is truth - OK. If that is a lie, then we need to know.
Every episode of Candace’s show since Charlie died, from her heartfelt emotional tribute to her exceptional journalism, has been incredible.
And anyone who cares for the truth and who wants to know who killed Charlie, for real, should watch every episode in sequence.
The fact is that what we are being told as his friends, or simply as people who had never heard of Charlie Kirk before his assassination, simply does not make sense to the vast majority.
It feels like gaslighting. It feels like we are being lied to. It is not hard to tell the truth to the public or to present the clear facts that illustrate the truth clearly.
Many extremely ethical people helped to build Turning Point and all associated groups, Turning Point Action and Turning Point Faith.
Many of these people, are existing and potential future donors.
We know many of them.
Ethical people will not stand for lies or injustice, either privately or publicly.
The existing and future donors who were friends of Charlie’s and those he loved deserve no less.
But please spare us the absurd and evil suppression of suggesting that Candace should not be doing exactly what she is doing.
She is doing no more and no less than what her friend Charlie would do for her.
Her actions are far more reasonable and experienceable than an assassin’s bullet to the throat.
Consider for a moment, the evil of possibly allowing the conviction of a potentially innocent party with the death penalty.