>>167619, >>167620, >>167621, >>167622, >>167623, >>167624, >>167625, >>167626, >>167627, >>167628, >>167629, >>167630, >>167631, >>167632, >>167633, >>167634, >>167635, >>167636, >>167637, >>167638, >>167639, >>167640, >>167641, >>167642, >>167643, >>167644, >>167645, >>167646, >>167647, >>167648, >>167649, >>167650, >>167651, >>167652, >>167653, >>167654, >>167655, >>167656, >>167657, >>167658, >>167659, >>167660, >>167661, >>167662, >>167663, >>167664, >>167665, >>167666, >>167667, >>167668, >>167669, >>167670, >>167671, >>167672, >>167673
Steve Inman @SteveInmanUIC - Non-essential Classic Hits
https://x.com/SteveInmanUIC/status/1981687852561019226

Steve Inman @SteveInmanUIC - More Classic Hits
https://rumble.com/v7093tg-idiots-finding-out.html
https://x.com/SteveInmanUIC/status/1981687855002071298

Stonetoss Comics @stone_toss - 67
https://x.com/stone_toss/status/1981359958991286372

Surajit @surajit_ghosh2 - #3IATLAS has reportedly changed its trajectory just before passing behind the Sun
Recent real time observations indicate a widening positional discrepancy between NASA’s JPL Horizons predictions and the actual measured sky coordinates of this interstellar object. While the distance measurement remains the same its location in the sky is diverging suggesting a lateral acceleration unaccounted for by standard gravitational models
According to NASA’s data 3IATLAS should have been at:
RA: 13h 46m 57.51s
Dec: -08° 15′ 20.0″
But the observation recorded: