>>170028, >>170029. >>170030, >>170031, >>170032, >>170033, >>170034, >>170035, >>170036, >>170037, >>170038, >>170039, >>170040, >>170041, >>170042, >>170043, >>170044, >>170045, >>170046, >>170047, >>170048, >>170049, >>170050, >>170051, >>170052, >>170053, >>170054, >>170055, >>170056, >>170057, >>170058, >>170059, >>170060, >>170061, >>170062, >>170063, >>170064, >>170065
Father V @father_rmv - The phrase “hocus pocus” is one of those expressions that has become so thoroughly absorbed into everyday English that most people no longer hear any religious echo in it. Today it simply means nonsense, sleight-of-hand, or empty theatrical magic. Yet its origins lie deep in the bitter religious controversies of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and almost all serious linguistic and historical scholarship traces it to a deliberate Protestant mockery of the central act of Catholic worship: the consecration of the Eucharist in the Latin Mass.
At the heart of the traditional Roman Rite, during the canon of the Mass, the priest pronounces over the bread the words of institution spoken by Christ at the Last Supper. In Latin these are: “Hoc est enim corpus meum” — “For this is my body.” Immediately after these words, according to Catholic doctrine, the bread ceases to be bread and becomes the true Body of Christ while retaining the appearances of bread — a mystery called transubstantiation. To Protestant reformers, especially the more radical ones in England, this teaching was not only false but idolatrous, the very epitome of everything they condemned as “popish superstition.” The idea that a priest could, by muttering a few Latin words, transform ordinary bread into God Himself struck many English Protestants as the grossest kind of conjuring trick.
Out of that polemical atmosphere was born “hocus pocus.” The first two words of the Latin formula — “hoc est” — were shortened, garbled, and given a mocking, pseudo-magical rhythm. By the early seventeenth century the phrase was being used to describe jugglers, conjurers, and anyone who tried to pass off deception as reality. The earliest clear printed references leave little doubt about the intended target. In 1624 Thomas Ady, writing against witch-hunting hysteria, complained of cunning jugglers who “have had a trick to make men believe they could turn bread into the body of Christ, and they called it Hocus Pocus.” A decade later, in 1634, the Anglican churchman John Tillotson — later Archbishop of Canterbury — stated the connection even more bluntly: “In all probability those common juggling words of hocus pocus are nothing else but a corruption of hoc est corpus, by way of ridiculous imitation of the priests of the Church of Rome in their trick of transubstantiation.”
The mockery spread quickly. Street conjurers adopted the phrase as a nonsense incantation, sometimes even styling themselves “Hocus Pocus” as a stage name — the most famous being a performer recorded in the 1630s who claimed to be “the King’s Majesty’s most excellent Hocus Pocus.” What had begun as anti-Catholic satire thus passed into general popular culture, and over time the original religious insult was forgotten by most speakers. Yet the major dictionaries — the Oxford English Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, and the majority of etymological studies — still list the derivation from “hoc est corpus meum” as the primary and best-documented origin.
Alternative explanations have occasionally been proposed: that it comes from the name of a Welsh magician called Ochus Bochus, or that it imitates the supposed gibberish of sorcerers. None of these theories, however, can point to anything like the contemporary seventeenth-century testimony that directly links the phrase to the Latin Mass. In an age when England was tearing itself apart over the very question of whether the Eucharist was the real Body of Christ or a mere memorial symbol, turning the solemn words of consecration into a term for cheap magic was a pointed and devastating insult.
https://x.com/father_rmv/status/1994422674727096540
39