>>172234, >>172235, >>172236, >>172237, >>172238, >>172239, >>172240, >>172241
And before anyone says, "Why should they dignify any of this with a response?!": Harpole and Kirk have both already provided *some* receipts, but unfortunately what they've provided doesn't falsify Mitch's allegations completely. So since they've already dignified it by responding with some receipts, I don't think it's too much to ask that they finish the job with some final receipts.
Full disclosure: My own bias is that I think the most likely explanation is that he was indeed on base and is either misremembering, confusing faces, or seeking attention for some other reason. But, the longer this drags out, and the more that non-debunking receipts keep being issued, the more likely it becomes, IMO. I don't make the rules.
Again, I'm basically relying upon either Mitch or Harpole/Kirk/Phillips for the truth. It's unfortunate that it has to be this way, but as just one guy without subpoena power or limitless investigative resources, I don't have other options. And that puts me in the same boat as almost everyone else.
https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/2005371755540484399

Capt Kyle @CaptKylePatriot - Video: POTUS flirting with FLOTUS breaks the internet. ❤
@CaptKylePatriot
https://x.com/CaptKylePatriot/status/2005083291771437246

Cardinal R. Sarah @Card_R_Sarah - Painting: Adoration of the Shepherds" by Gerard van Honthorst
https://x.com/Card_R_Sarah/status/2003888731238158596

Carrie Severino @JCNSeverino - “After two defeats at the Supreme Court, you would think even the dullest lower-court judge would get the message: Stop messing with the Little Sisters of the Poor...That should have been the end of it. But Pennsylvania and New Jersey won’t take no for an answer.” - @wjmcgurn
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/when-nuns-fight-back-4d46ac21
https://wsj.com/opinion/when-nuns-fight-back-4d46ac21