>>176305, >>176306, >>176307, >>176308, >>176309, >>176310, >>176311, >>176312, >>176313, >>176314, >>176315, >>176316, >>176317, >>176318, >>176319, >>176320, >>176321, >>176322, >>176323, >>176324, >>176325
Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald - That SCOTUS once again struck down a key Trump policy will have no effect on the narrative that SCOTUS is a blindly loyal, Trump-subservient rubber-stamp.
And it's hardly the first time: they rejected every 2020 election challenge. Media narratives are never re-evaluated.
https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/2024876347193974963

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald - When Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, the Dem/media consensus was that she was a religious freak who would never oppose Trump, and even had agreed to overturn 2020 results if he lost.
That she became the most independent Justice provoked no apologies or reconsiderations.
https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/2024876738719687071

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald - Major scandal in the UK: the centrist faction of the governing Labour Party (the Starmer wing) investigated journalists who were critical of them and submitted false reports to the GCHQ to malign them as Russian agents.
The Guardian is at the center because it, and its editor @PippaCrerar, are loyal tools of that faction of Labour.
It's long been known that among those snooped on was @mtaibbi and @TheGrayzoneNews. But nobody in the UK cared until they learned that they also snooped on corporate journalists, who are part of the London club and are supposed to be off-limits.
Quote
Richard Sanders @PulaRJS
OK - now we are really getting down to the nitty gritty on the Labour Together scandal. @guardian lays out events in detail here and it is hard to see how Josh Simons survives.
But The Guardian - in the final paragraphs - is still being only half honest about its own role. Paul Holden wasn't just "approached for comment" by the paper about the Simons smears.
Political Editor @PippaCrerar told him they were going to publish a story the next day that the National Cyber Security Centre (part of GCHQ) was investigating the origin of documents he had supplied to the Sunday Times.