Anonymous
04/06/2026 (Mon) 14:41
Id: 344dd2
No.180067
del
>>179952,
>>179953,
>>179954,
>>179955,
>>179956,
>>179957,
>>179958,
>>179959,
>>179960,
>>179961,
>>179962,
>>179963,
>>179964,
>>179965,
>>179966,
>>179967,
>>179968,
>>179969,
>>179970,
>>179971,
>>179972,
>>179973,
>>179974,
>>179975,
>>179976,
>>179977,
>>179978,
>>179979,
>>179980,
>>179981,
>>179982,
>>179983,
>>179984,
>>179985,
>>179986,
>>179987,
>>179988,
>>179989,
>>179990,
>>179991,
>>179992,
>>179993,
>>179994,
>>179995,
>>179996,
>>179997,
>>179998,
>>179999,
>>180000,
>>180001,
>>180002,
>>180003,
>>180004,
>>180005,
>>180006,
>>180007,
>>180008,
>>180009,
>>180010,
>>180011,
>>180012,
>>180013,
>>180014,
>>180015,
>>180016,
>>180017,
>>180018,
>>180019,
>>180020,
>>180021,
>>180022,
>>180023,
>>180024,
>>180025,
>>180026,
>>180027,
>>180028,
>>180029,
>>180030,
>>180031,
>>180032,
>>180033,
>>180034,
>>180035,
>>180036,
>>180037,
>>180038,
>>180039,
>>180040,
>>180041,
>>180042,
>>180043,
>>180044,
>>180045,
>>180046,
>>180047,
>>180048,
>>180049,
>>180050,
>>180051,
>>180052,
>>180053,
>>180054,
>>180055,
>>180056,
>>180057,
>>180058,
>>180059,
>>180060,
>>180061,
>>180062,
>>180063,
>>180064,
>>180065,
>>180066Washington Free Beacon @FreeBeacon - It took long enough, but we’re glad the New York Times has finally embraced the Stiles Section’s avant-garde approach to graphic design. The execution was terrible, and so was the accompanying article about all the “architects” who “say” and “warn” that Donald Trump’s ballroom expansion was poorly designed, which quotes a single architect who happens to serve on the preservation group suing to stop the ballroom’s construction.
But it’s the thought that counts.
https://x.com/FreeBeacon/status/2040083670128533763Washington Free Beacon @FreeBeacon - This week’s STILES SECTION has arrived.
@AndrewStilesUSA writes:
NASA launched three astronauts (and one Canadian interloper) into space to reiterate America’s rightful claim to the moon. The 10-day trip around the lunar body—the first of its kind since the Nixon administration—will set the stage for a return to the moon’s surface in 2028 and, ultimately, a permanent base. Most people agree that this was awesome. As one enthusiastic Florida kid told CNN: “We’re going back to the f—ing moon!” Meanwhile, a handful of insufferable scolds whined about colonialism and warned that an American moon base could “violate international law”—to which any reasonable person might respond with a combination of “shut the f— up” and “drill, baby, drill.”
Bottom line: The moon is ours; get over it. Don’t be insufferable; be Florida kid.
https://x.com/FreeBeacon/status/2040083665221193990Washington Journal @cspanwj - Brookings Institution's @asliaydintasbas discusses latest on the Iran war, including the U.S. effort to open the Strait of Hormuz
Watch here:
https://www.c-span.org/event/washington-journal/04-05-2026/441705 https://x.com/cspanwj/status/2040782259616141595Washington Journal @cspanwj - MON| Rice University's Baker Institute nonresident fellow Mark Finley (@finley_mark) discusses the impact of the Iran war on global energy.
Message too long. Click here to view full text.