>>186689, >>186690, >>186691, >>186692, >>186693, >>186694, >>186695, >>186696
The question the rules exist to answer: were charitable assets, in substance, converted into political campaign spending? Only the IRS can see the grant agreements and donor records that settle it — and the findings have been referred there.
I'm a forensic accountant and a registered Democrat. I follow the documents, not the politics. Every figure here is from the organizations' own IRS returns.
Full chain, line by line, with sources:
https://whitecollarfraud.com/2026/06/25/the-soros-tides-arabella-pipeline-how-charitable-dollars-reached-a-federal-super-pac/
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2070201248591323475

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - It wasn't specific words. I ran oppo research on all of the candidates, decided Strand was the guy.
Quote:
Brian Gamble @briangamble_v1
It's a crowded field here. I'd be curious as to what John said to you that led to the endorsement.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2070203058794139976

David Hoffman @TrustlessState - If USA beats you in the World Cup
That country has to call it Soccer until the next World Cup
New rule I just made up
https://x.com/TrustlessState/status/2067632660269191510