>>188918, >>188919, >>188920, >>188921, >>188922, >>188923, >>188924, >>188925, >>188926, >>188927, >>188928, >>188929, >>188930, >>188931, >>188932, >>188933, >>188934, >>188935, >>188936, >>188937, >>188938
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - I'm aware. I do distinguish factions. All of globalism supported military action to deliver democracy by force back then, but GWB and Republicans pushed one grounded in American patriotism and leadership (remember Freedom Fries). That's why Soros objected to the Iraq invasion even though he supported removing Saddam by force on principle.
Parent Post:
If-It-Looks-Like-A-Naz @IfItLooksLikeA1 - .@DataRepublican Were you alive when GHWB declared about the New World Order? GHWB was CIA. The CIA, from its inception to this day works to advance the New World Order.
You really should be following @ColonelTowner because she will help you see the historical light.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2081378222382764133

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - 🫡
Parent Post:
InfantryDort @infantrydort - Is there a bigger useful idiot for the journalist class than this guy? Maybe it’s time to do a deep dive and find out what Joe Byerly’s REAL motivations are.
Quoted Post:
Joe Byerly @jbyerly81 - Active-duty military leaders should resist the temptation to treat the press as an adversary.
Yes, individual reporters and outlets can be unfair. They may approach a story with assumptions, pursue a particular angle, or ask questions designed to provoke. Military leaders should correct inaccurate reporting and challenge false premises when necessary.
But disagreement with the press is different from antagonism toward it.
A free and independent press plays an essential role in our country. Reporters ask questions on behalf of citizens who cannot enter our headquarters, attend our meetings, or see how decisions are made. Those citizens fund the military, entrust it with extraordinary authority, and send their sons and daughters into its ranks. They deserve accountability.
The military is also one of the few institutions that brings together Americans from nearly every background, region, belief system, and political perspective. During my time in command, I proudly served alongside and led men and women with whom I did not always agree. Their character, competence, and commitment to the mission were what mattered.
That experience reinforced and idea that makes our military such an important institution in our country: military leaders do not represent one political party, ideology, or segment of the country. We serve all of it.