>>189498, >>189499, >>189500, >>189501, >>189502, >>189503, >>189504, >>189505, >>189506, >>189507, >>189508, >>189509, >>189510, >>189511, >>189512, >>189513, >>189514, >>189515, >>189516, >>189517, >>189518
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - yes but tbh it's not a 50/50 situation when the epicenter was so close to the Wuhan lab, and also when Wuhan scientists got sick in 2019
Parent Post:
PoIiMath @politicalmath - This is such an important point
We DON'T KNOW what the origin of Covid is. There is very little proof positive evidence in any direction.
Poking holes in the lab leak does not prove natural origin. Poking holes in natural origin does not prove lab leak.
If we are trying to act like investigative scientists, we need to recognize the limitations
Quoted Post:
Alina Chan @Ayjchan - There is a misperception that a natural origin of Covid is supported by science while a lab origin is only speculation.
Both are only supported by circumstantial evidence. The lab leak theory is also built on scientific docs, including grants, reports, theses & papers.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2083427118969688419

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - These *are* my alcohol thoughts unfortunately.
Parent Post:
Constitutional Nobody @TrueGritNewsMan - My Friday night thoughts are nothing like yours. They usually start with alcohol and end with me curled up hiding under a pillow. You gotta loosen up. Lol.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2083427908241260671