>>189731, >>189732, >>189733, >>189734, >>189735, >>189736, >>189737, >>189738, >>189739, >>189740, >>189741, >>189742, >>189743, >>189744, >>189745, >>189746, >>189747, >>189748, >>189749
Eric Graves @EricGravesKMBC - Video: “We won so fast I wasn’t even ready for the speech.”
State Sen. Ty Masterson is on to November as the Republican candidate for Kansas Governor. He just took the stage in Wichita. Live report at 10 on @kmbc.
https://x.com/EricGravesKMBC/status/2084825088634089911

Ethical Skeptic @EthicalSkeptic - "The standout finding was that the single best-performing site in the entire country - the one with the lowest (and even favourable) mortality statistics - was located in Wellington Central, right in the seat of government."
Pharma and Govmt insiders whispered to get saline shots, and where to find the locations giving them.
Folleagues knew over 4 years ago that this was the case.
Quoted Post:
Liz Gunn @LizGunnNZ - Video: Barry Young: The Safest Vaccine Site in New Zealand Was Right Next to Parliament
@BarryYoungNZ explains the detailed statistical analysis he performed on the New Zealand vaccination data. Using the same tools an epidemiologist would employ - graphs, confidence intervals, Poisson scores, p-values and Standardised Mortality Rates (SMRs) - he examined both the national picture and individual vaccination sites.
While the overall data showed excess mortality, results varied sharply by location: some sites recorded significantly elevated deaths, others performed better than expected.
The standout finding was that the single best-performing site in the entire country - the one with the lowest (and even favourable) mortality statistics - was located in Wellington Central, right in the seat of government.
Barry notes that this variation suggests the doses were not uniform across New Zealand and raises the unresolved question of why the centre nearest Parliament produced such markedly different results.
A clear, data-driven examination of what site-level analysis reveals.
Transcript:
“I was thinking, well, as an epidemiologist, how would they look at this data?