>>191174, >>191175, >>191176, >>191177, >>191178, >>191179, >>191180, >>191181, >>191182, >>191183, >>191184, >>191185, >>191186, >>191187, >>191188, >>191189, >>191190, >>191191, >>191192, >>191193
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - The best explanation is what she gave me - she wanted to give a "gift" to get on my good side and did not realize the asymmetry of the ask between handler and receiver.
Parent Post:
Tired of being politically correct @USBornNRaised - I am still confused and want to stay on topic here.
If the Under Secretary could simply post them herself hours later (and they were already shared with Congress in some form), why did she route them to you with the markings still live and the 'explicit' request to leak. I am not in the underbelly so I would like to understand this better.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2091579351955370459

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - His relationship with Kirk was much more complicated and sincere than you portray it as, and they never stopped communications.
Parent Post:
Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre - I am less sure that having James Lindsay, a guy who has now described many of Charlie Kirk's own beliefs as woke, cozy up to you and tell you the "woke right" is responsible for this mistake is the correct take away here
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2091582553937367040

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - I think you're misreading the point I'm trying to make here: @ConceptualJames and I disagree. A lot. Quite a lot. And it's gotten heated at times.
We pushed to reconcile differences, and gradually built up that we weren't enemies. And when I needed it, he surprised me by being simply a friend.
BTW, my position on the Vance/Rubio debate is that Trump will endorse one or the other and it'll be all moot then.
Parent Post:
Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre - What are we doing here?