>>192712, >>192713, >>192714, >>192715, >>192716, >>192717, >>192718, >>192719, >>192720, >>192721, >>192722, >>192723, >>192724, >>192725
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Hello Vanity Fair,
Charlie Kirk's numbers person here from 2024 Election Day.
It was obvious within about 30 minutes of polls closing in Kentucky that Trump was massively outperforming his 2016 and 2020 margins, even in urban centers.
Charlie told me to cross off NC and GA less than an hour after their polls closed because he already had enough data to conclude those states were firmly in the Trump column.
The only reason we held out on confidently declaring victory was that we were waiting for one of Philadelphia, Milwaukee, and Wayne county to fully turn in their returns. But by the time we reached that point (which I documented below - 6:43 PM PT), it was a virtual mathematical impossibility for Trump to lose in an honest election.
If this is "one of the most explosive moments" in the film, then it is a very boring movie indeed. And now I know to skip it. Thank you.
Quoted Post:
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Charlie - "omg lackawanna. this could swing the whole state" (PA)
It's early, but omg Pennsylvania...
Parent Post:
VANITY FAIR @VanityFair - In one of the most explosive moments of ‘Musk,’ the new documentary from filmmaker Alex Gibney, Elon Musk's ex-lover Ashley St. Clair suggests that Musk interfered with the 2024 election, recalling that he left the Mar-a-Lago celebration early and later told her he knew it would go in Trump’s favor.
St. Clair says that Musk had a “degree of certainty” about the results before they came in that “I had never seen before.” And told him she didn’t want to know more because she didn’t want to be “deposed,” to which, according to St. Clair, Musk replied that she was wise
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2097747497963921824

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - 1,501
Parent Post: