Anonymous 10/06/2026 (Tue) 22:12 Id: f6f306 No.195217 del
>>195059, >>195197, >>195198, >>195199, >>195200, >>195201, >>195202, >>195203, >>195204, >>195205, >>195206, >>195207, >>195208, >>195209, >>195210, >>195211, >>195212, >>195213, >>195214, >>195215, >>195216
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - With the caveat that we won’t know if mail-in votes are currently being measured against poll misses or continued COVID-19 drop-off. We’ll start having more in-person early voting data next week.
Parent Post:
Chamath Palihapitiya @chamath
What is happening to the Blue Wave? Will it turn out, instead, to be a Blue Spritz? What if it’s not Blue at all?
Maybe Independents and many Democrats are recoiling in realtime at the socialism, doomerism and radicalism agenda.
Next few weeks will be really telling.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2106770178641932548

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - 2024 was the best-predicted election in history because of early voting analysis. But, also early voting made it quite clear.
2026 is the iron test.
Parent Post:
Chris @chriswithans
She lost every single swing state and the NPV, and NE-02 MN and NH were closer than Arizona. VA NJ and NM were 6 or less.
It was the “least close” election since 2000.
There was no edge.
Also her money advantage wasn’t real. She spent money to make money, meaning most of her spending was to convince voters already voting for her to give her money.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.