>>195059, >>195197, >>195198, >>195199, >>195200, >>195201, >>195202, >>195203, >>195204, >>195205, >>195206, >>195207, >>195208, >>195209, >>195210, >>195211, >>195212, >>195213, >>195214, >>195215, >>195216, >>195217, >>195218, >>195219, >>195220, >>195221, >>195222, >>195223, >>195224, >>195225, >>195226, >>195227, >>195228, >>195229, >>195230, >>195231, >>195232, >>195233, >>195234, >>195235, >>195236, >>195237, >>195238, >>195239, >>195240, >>195241, >>195242, >>195243, >>195244, >>195245, >>195246, >>195247, >>195248, >>195249, >>195250, >>195251, >>195252, >>195253, >>195254, >>195255, >>195256, >>195257, >>195258, >>195259, >>195260, >>195261, >>195262, >>195263, >>195264, >>195265, >>195266, >>195267, >>195268,>>195269, >>195270, >>195271, >>195272, >>195273, >>195274, >>195275, >>195276, >>195277, >>195278, >>195279, >>195280, >>195281, >>195282, >>195283, >>195284, >>195285, >>195286
SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire - Judge Sara Hill said the month of historical license plate data amounted to “indiscriminate mass surveillance,” reasoning that Supreme Court precedent protects privacy in the whole of a person’s movements even when individual movements occur in public.
Parent Post:
SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire
NEW: A federal judge in Oklahoma ruled that police violated the Fourth Amendment by searching Flock and other license plate reader data without a warrant, accessing more than 50 records of a driver’s movements across multiple states over a month.
>>25102960 pb
https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2106487377594110388

SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire - The court distinguished a 1983 Supreme Court ruling allowing police to track a car on public roads, noting that the Court expressly left open whether different constitutional rules would apply to future “dragnet” surveillance. Hill said modern ALPR networks present that concern.
Parent Post:
SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire
Judge Sara Hill said the month of historical license plate data amounted to “indiscriminate mass surveillance,” reasoning that Supreme Court precedent protects privacy in the whole of a person’s movements even when individual movements occur in public.
https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2106487379716350358

SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire - The deputy searched the database after seeing a California plate, before he had evidence of criminal activity. Hill found the warrantless search unconstitutional and suppressed the evidence that followed.
Read the ruling here:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/og-lookup/?file_path=recap/gov.uscourts.oknd.76981/gov.uscourts.oknd.76981.62.0.pdf