>>2143
Esotericism and postmodernist nonsense I see, but I am not so sure about "religion is not boringly wrong" as a distinguishing feature of that group. If what you mean is that they consider religion or a religion substitute like humanism useful as a hedonic accessory and a motivator, I think a nontrivial number (10%+) of regular old rationalists who are not otherwise in the postrat cluster would agree, including SA. (Though it may be that they mean different things by "religion".)