>>6644
>harmful for whom?
"Society", in terms of opportunity costs. I doubt wagecucks end up with any of the money even if billionaires successfully get bullied out of philanthropy. And some of their projects could actually be useful. At the very least, I consider the ceiling of good that a billionaire can do with their money higher than what a democracy would do with it.

>>6646
Very bespoke, anon. But I don't think it actually matters much either way because The Singularity Is Near.