>>3799
We are going to have to take into account a number of things here:

>the Earth being now spiritually run by yokais who are at most anarchists, if they can be described at all
>the galactic federation entering to take control with the aim of protecting natural resources
>this does not conflict with the collective, but the terminology changes as the federation considers capitalism to be "the creation and use of weapons for the purpose of non-sustainable exploitation of natural resources"
>this to be contrasted with communism being the use of naturally growing capital created through organic processes in an idle manner, letting nature be and "harvesting the fruits without harming the tree"

With that said, the federation would consider the collective to be anarcho-communist, but the meaning in our view would not change, it is a semantic change.

>>3800
>What do you think of libertarian monarchism?
Seems to be the same idea as describing UK as anarcho-monarchist? I don't personally see much difference between libertarianism and anarchism.

It would be the difference between bottom left and bottom right, but what is the actual difference? Isn't it just manifesting when compared to the upper quadrants on the same side? If we removed the top two, I think the bottom two could be said to be the same thing.