>>6550
>>6551
I had to come up with a new word. An - lack of, Idryma - the institution. So were such an idea to exist, it would speak of the Idryma. I didn't channel the word but rather obtained the Greek translation of the word 'institution' and modified it a bit further and also Anglicized it, giving the term Anidrymism.

I believe the King being free himself or not isn't too important, what matters is that there is always a third density reflection of the one of the most power, and even this is no true master, but rather a slave to unseen forces. I would posit an axiom of freedom of choosing one's master here: that it is inherent to the human individual to have something as its master, but the freedom humanity does have is in choosing its master.

Takd me for example: I have altered my fate alongside the succubus current, so you could say that the succubus current is my master.

I mean to say that, were I to personally invest in Anidrymism by spreading it, it would be a full-on philosophy with a praxis, and one that seeks to be pragmatic rather than, say, mere rejection of social institutions by the followers choosing to, perhaps, implode.

Furthermore, as I hinted earlier, Anidrymism isn't against utilizing sociological principles against sociological manifestations. How exactly, I'm not sure, but one scenario is it being a self-organizing phenomenon. Another is using more traditional forms of social organization.

Also,let's say Anidrymism successfully gets rid of Civilization. Then what? It seems that tapping into the concept of post-civilization might provide some hints. An investation into Hobbesianism might prove useful, if only because it is pretty much the opposite of Anidrymism; the contrast is refreshing and helps show what Anidrymism is against.