Anonymous 09/09/2025 (Tue) 17:06 No.29069 del
>>28800
Your obfuscations are boring and poorly constructed. While it's certainly true that Forest et al. have sold what is known as "sfw+" content — non-nude/lewd content — it's the worst of their actions. Those that have been proven, at the least. Sico has acquired and distributed the nudes of underage girls, many of whom are her current accusers. It's a clear case of cyberbullying, for which she is being socially ostracized. Furthermore, she inherited her menagerie of pedophiles from other sellers and groomers. Someone has mentioned Snoo already, but I would remind everyone that Sico's current buyers today were buying from Lux, Star, Kay, Kef, and Emory yesterday. In terms of marketing and customer retention, it's an incestuous circle. Sico has also been proven to engage in explicit behavior with a few of these mentioned buyers for their sexual gratification. Adult men such as Ualda, Joshua, Kosakii, R.A.D., and so forth are buyers of some notoriety. One of the other buyers, James, is supposedly a minor in his own right, but I'll mention him regardless.
>>28863
These three were the most popular sellers mentioned on Sturdychan. I believe the middle girl, Kay, only just recently reached the age of 18, but they were all selling sfw+ content well before they became legal adults.