>>58891
>How can you know what anonymous user shared what information and why does it give the administrator of the site the right to then share the location dox? You do understand that it could be a self dox false flag right?
And you understand that they were just repeating that same maybe false flag and even linked to it? It's clear you are arguing in bad faith I don't know why I bother.
>>58890
>In many countries (especially in Europooristan and the yuukay), it is exceedingly easy to get ISPs to hand over customer data via a simplified court order. Copyright trolls do it all the time. No proof of any wrongdoing is required, only a simple formal request under the guise of some breach of contract. Doing so would not be outside what a schizo-rogue admin could do.
That feels like a crime, and probably is. Also no way in hell that would happen anywhere in europooristan with gdpr.
>Be smart and choose a country as an exit node that requires formal proof of wrongdoing before handing over data and where such a procedure would require a considerable amount of effort. Select a VPN that resides in a jurisdiction which requires little to no logging. Lastly, if your threat model requires it: TOR.
Seems like a lot of work for posting tiktoks, do you always act as if you were in some kind of insurgency group?
>why so upset? what do you care if we use noschizos or not?
honestly I would prefer if you didn't, I'm just bothered by your tech ignorance/naivety