>>799

First of all, I didn't specifically mention tulpamancy as the neck-bearded wack-jobs are an instant poison pill to any philosophical debate. Akin to mentioning furries outside a derogatory light to anyone for any reason.

Secondly she did read my original position but lacked the knowledge or background to make cognizant response. So although she sounds Bearisian, she likely achieved this level of understanding by wholly different means.