>>26157
>>26182
I disagree, and I sincerely don't think it's cope. I personally hate indirect arguments, and low level insults like attacking someone's looks, but physiognomy is a real thing.
Every time I see someone use terms like that on normiebook, I curiously glance at the profile pic, and sure enough, every time it's a trainwreck. My pattern recognition is screaming at me.
Again, I don't intend to dunk on people's looks, but at some point I gotta wonder if this shit is some kind of projection.
>SJWs feeling guilty so they claim everyone else is bigoted (even among themselves)
>unattractive women immediately calling men "ugly" at the slightest disagreement
>and slutty/unwanted women calling men virgins\incel\etc.
They always say the things that sting the most to themselves.